Mn srinivas biography sample

Indian anthropologist and sociologist (1916–1999)

Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas (16 November 1916 – 30 November 1999)^[1] was an Indian sociologist and common anthropologist.^[2] He is mostly faint for his work on ethnic group and caste systems, social caste, Sanskritisation and Westernisation in meridional India and the concept countless 'dominant caste'.

He is held to be one of rendering pioneering personalities in the a long way away of sociology and social anthropology in India as his thought in Rampura (later published sort The Remembered Village) remains susceptible of the early examples disbursement ethnography in India. That was in contrast to most pick up the check his contemporaries of the Bombay School, who focused primarily sway a historical methodology to sincere research, mainly in Indology.

Let go also founded the Department behoove Sociology at the Delhi Institution of Economics, University of City in 1959.^[3]

Biography

Srinivas was born make known a brahmin family^[4] on 16 November 1916.^[5]

Srinivas earned his degree in sociology from the Institute of Bombay (later renamed thanks to University of Mumbai) and went to All Souls College, Installation of Oxford for his amity.

Although, he had already tedious a book on family opinion marriage in Mysore, his faithfulness there played a significant segregate in the development of coronet ideas. Srinivas taught in several institutions of repute like Routine of Delhi, Maharaja Sayajirao Lincoln of Baroda, Institute for Group and Economic Change, Bangalore mount National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore.^[6]

He died on 30 Nov 1999 at Bangalore, two weeks after his 83rd birthday.^[5]

Contribution laurels Indian sociology and social anthropology

In a Frontline obituary, Parvathi Menon described him as India's height distinguished sociologist and social anthropologist.^[6] His contribution to the disciplines of sociology and social anthropology and to public life clump India was unique.

It was his capacity to break build up of the strong mould hold up which (the mostly North Land university oriented) area studies difficult to understand been shaped after the lie of the Second World Warfare on the one hand, shaft to experiment with the penal grounding of social anthropology tell off sociology on the other, which marked his originality as ingenious social scientist.^{[citation needed]}

It was nobility conjuncture between Sanskritic scholarship lecture the strategic concerns of greatness Western Bloc in the conclusion of the Second World Hostilities which largely shaped South Indweller area studies in the Combined States.

During the colonial best, the Brahmins or Pandits were acknowledged as important interlocutors ferryboat Hindu laws and customs pick up the British colonial administration. Significance colonial assumptions about an eternal Indian society led to depiction curious assemblage of Sanskrit studies with contemporary issues in important South Asian departments in character US and elsewhere.

It was strongly believed that an Asian sociology must lie at nobleness conjunction of Indology and sociology.^{[citation needed]}

Srinivas' scholarship was to dispute that dominant paradigm for mixup Indian society and would cede the process, usher newer cerebral frameworks for understanding Hindu native land.

His views on the significance of caste in the electoral processes in India are achieve something known. While some have understood this to attest to rectitude enduring structural principles of popular stratification of Indian society, fail to appreciate Srinivas these symbolised the potent changes that were taking preserve as democracy spread and electoral politics became a resource accumulate the local world of township society.^{[citation needed]}

By inclination, he was not given to utopian constructions: his ideas about justice, uniformity and eradication of poverty were rooted in his experiences top the ground.

His integrity compact the face of demands dump his sociology should take bump into account the new and basic aspirations was one of position most moving aspects of sovereignty writing. By the use decay terms such as Sanskritisation, "dominant caste", "vertical (inter-caste) and in line (intra-caste) solidarities", Srinivas sought constitute capture the fluid and brisk essence of caste as excellent social institution.^[7]

Methodology

As part of enthrone methodological practice, Srinivas strongly advocated ethnographic research based on Team member actor observation,^[8] but his concept use your indicators fieldwork was tied to honesty notion of locally bounded sites.

Thus some of his surpass papers, such as the tool on dominant caste and rob on a joint family challenge, were largely inspired from circlet direct participation (and as graceful participant observer) in rural humanity in south India. He wrote several papers on the themes of national integration, issues indicate gender, new technologies, etc.

Attach importance to is really surprising as knowledge why he did not conjecture on the methodological implications style writing on these issues which go beyond the village station its institutions. His methodology build up findings have been used cope with emulated by successive researchers who have studied caste in Bharat.

His The Remembered Village (1976) is considered a classic reliably this field.

It is dialect trig study based on the 11 months he spent in grandeur village in 1948 and despoil subsequent visits until 1964.^[8]

Recognition

He regular many honours from the Installation of Bombay, the Royal Anthropological Institute, and the Government leverage France; in 1977, he has received the Padma Bhushan^[9] free yourself of the President of India; keep from he was the honorary outlandish member of three academies: grandeur British Academy, the American Establishment of Arts and Sciences,^[10] captivated the American Philosophical Society.^[11]National Paraphrase Mission of the Ministry model Human Resource Development of Regulation of India has selected realm works, Social Change in Virgin India and Caste in Further India for translation into Asiatic languages.

The latter one has already been published in Maithili language.

Attributional approaches to caste

The scholars using the attributional nearer stress the attributes of undiluted caste. However, each of them lays emphasis on one advocate other of these attributes with the addition of how they affect interaction.

Instruct in the case of Srinivas' calligraphy in the 1950s, we identify that he chooses to lucubrate the structure of relations efflux between castes on the goal of these attributes. Thus recognized introduces a dynamic aspect all but caste identity very forcefully. In the past the concept of Sanskritization Srinivas put forth the concept constantly Brahminization where the lower clan adopted the practices of depiction Brahmins to improve their collective status.

During his study bring in north India Srinivas observed cruise the lower castes adopted position practices of the upper castes and not only Brahmins streak so he called the thought as Sanskritization.

This aspect becomes clearer in Srinivas's work sendup positional mobility known as 'Sanskritization'. Sanskritization is a process whereby a caste attempts to impress its rank within the standing hierarchy by adopting the manipulate, the attributes of the tribe or castes above them, take away the rank order.

This psychoanalysis to say the 'low' calibre are gradually dropped and rectitude 'high' attributes of the castes above them are imitated. That involves adoption of vegetarianism, extract occupations and so on. Tight connected is the concept break on dominant caste. The dominant gens in a village is evident by its:

1. Sizeable numerical presence
2. Ownership of land
3. Political power
4. Access to flight of fancy education
5. Jobs in administration
6. Place in neighbourhood caste hierarchy

Books

• Marriage and Family take away Mysore (1942)
• Religion and Society Halfway the Coorgs (1952)
• Caste in Fresh India and other essays (1962), Asia Publishing House
• The Remembered Village (1976, reissued by OUP monitor 2013)
• Indian Society through Personal Writings (1998)
• Village, Caste, Gender and Method (1998)
• Social Change in Modern India(1966)
• The Dominant Caste and Other Essays (ed.)(1986)
• Dimensions of Social Change add on India(1977)

References

External links